Many manufacturers don’t fully understand the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), its ramifications, and the steps they should take to protect their businesses.
With new regulations, including unlikely, but possible, criminal liabilities, becoming effective June 30, gaining some perspective is more important than ever.
Understanding FSMA and new liabilities
Each year, 3,000 Americans die from foodborne illness (Source: CDC). FSMA was enacted to prevent contamination in the food supply chain and save lives.
FSMA has four main objectives:
If your company is required by the FDA to register under its current food facility registration regulations, FSMA applies to you.
In just two about months – by June 30, 2015 – the U.S. Food and Drug Administration must finalize a series of seven regulations that create significant new criminal liabilities affecting companies in the food industry (Source: Retail Leader).
How big is this? Once regulations are final, business operations can cease pending investigation and a company CEO can be held personally liable for violating any of the new regulations, even if that CEO had no knowledge of the violation. If your company doesn’t have strong controls in place to manage its production as well as other aspects of the supply chain, you’re taking on significant risk.
Recognizing the FDA’s reach
More than ever before, FSMA intends to hold the food industry accountable for securing the supply chain. Here’s a short list of what’s within the FDA’s power:
Protecting your business
Automation is helping the feed and grain industry meet the best practices called for by FSMA and other regulatory requirements. More than lower production costs, automation can improve food safety and help mitigate regulatory and commercial risks.
Consider a common scenario in which a plant operator producing a pre-mix for pet food is preparing hand-adds: An alarm goes off somewhere in the plant, and the operator stops what he’s doing to attend to the problem.
Automation can ensure that when the operator returns to his station, the plant’s processes aren’t jeopardized. The system can inform where he left off in the process, preventing errors such as too many, or not enough, ingredients from being added.
Additionally, data from the plant’s control system, including lot tracking, can automatically verify regulatory compliance and prove the product was manufactured correctly. The audit trail provides assurance of quality and consistency to the plant’s customer, and the FDA.
Yet, automation alone is not enough to protect you. A software platform verging on obsolescence increases risk. Manufacturers who operate on systems that are difficult to support or prone to error should not ignore what could be a ticking time bomb.
Is automation imperative for meeting FSMA requirements? No. Manual processes can keep you compliant, although they naturally invite human error. Cost is also a consideration. Manual processes can add production time and steal from your bottom line.
Tremendous advancements in process automation technology give you more options for protecting your business, people and their animals. Those who can provide assurances of safety and compliance will gain their customers’ trust – and a competitive advantage.
Need some help understanding FSMA and how to be prepared? Let’s Talk.